I'm Maeve Maddox.

I write about English usage, public education, and US popular culture. Welcome to my site.


Knowing a Preposition from a Particle

In my morning paper, the headline “Just do it! Dangle a few prepositions” caught my eye. The article is about the common misconception that ending a sentence with a preposition is a major writing flaw in English.

Because I have written on the same topic (“Go Ahead, Put that Preposition at the End”), I was curious to see what the writer had to say.

I faltered at the headline because in the context of grammar, the verb dangle applies to participles, but I put the choice of words down to the creativity of a headline writer.

Next, I puzzled over this definition offered by the writer: “Prepositions are words that describe location, time or condition.”

Prepositions do not by themselves describe location, time or condition.

Prepositions are used in combination with nouns, pronouns, or noun equivalents to create phrases that can describe location, time or condition. The most usual use of a preposition is to introduce a phrase. A prepositional phrase can then be used the way an adverb is used to to indicate where, when, and how.

For example:

Frodo lives in a hole. (location)

The children eat oatmeal in the morning. (time)

The boy’s life is in jeopardy. (condition)

A more accurate definition of preposition is this:

A preposition is a word that combines with a noun, pronoun, or noun equivalent to form a phrase that has an adverbial, adjectival, or substantival relation to some other word.

For example:

The woman with the red hair is beautiful. (prepositional phrase used adjectivally to describe the noun woman.)

Lola always travels with her cat. (prepositional phrase used adverbally to modify the verb travels.)

The teacher pointed to what I was writing. (prepositional phrase whose object is a noun clause [what I was writing], i.e., a noun equivalent.)

Next, the writer of this article about prepositions offered two examples of “awkward” sentences rewritten to eliminate “a preposition at the end.” Here they are:

Awkward: Where are you at?
Better: Where are you?

Awkward: Could you turn the light off?
Better: Could you turn off the light?

The problem with the first sentence is not that a preposition has been placed at the end. The problem is that the interrogative word where means “where in or at what place?” The at is not “misplaced.” It’s unnecessary.

The second sentence fails as an example for this discussion because the word off is not being used as a preposition in the usual way. In this sentence, off is a particle belonging to the phrasal verb, turn off.

Phrasal verbs are a common feature of English.

A phrasal verb is a verb that consists of two (or three) parts. The first word in the phrase is always a verb. The next word/s will be a word such as back, down, in, off, or any of several words that in other contexts would be identified as a preposition or an adverb. These words, when they are used as part of a phrasal verb, are called particles.

Some verb phrases are separable and some are not.

Separable phrasal verbs can take the object between the verb and the particle or after the particle. The phrasal verb turn off is separable. Either “Could you turn the light off” or “Could you turn off the light,” is acceptable idiomatic English.

When the object of a separable verb phrase is a pronoun, however, the object must go in the middle: “For the last time, could you please turn it off?”

“Could you please turn off it” is not an option.

Here are two better examples of sentences in which a preposition has left its object behind and comes all naked at the end of the sentence:

Who were you talking to?

The president of the college is the person you spilled coffee on.

Both these sentences are idiomatic English. Rewriting them would create very formal constructions that would sound stilted in modern conversational English:

To whom were you talking?

The president of the college is the person on whom you spilled coffee.

Bottom line: Ending a sentence with a preposition is not the gaffe some people seem to think it is. On the other hand, knowing when a word is a preposition can be a bit tricky.

Go Ahead, Put that Preposition at the End

Embers and Pleonasms

The NPR announcer who mentioned “still-hot embers” failed to understand the meaning of

Continue reading Embers and Pleonasms

Epithet and Epitaph

There’s no excuse for anyone who graduated from high school and writes professionally to confuse the words “epitaph” and “epithet.” If at no other time, they would have learned the meaning of “epitaph” when they studied Thomas Gray’s “Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard” in high school.

Continue reading Epithet and Epitaph

“Mic” Rhymes with “Bic”

According to the way it’s pronounced, the shortened form of “microphone” belongs to the same category as words like “bike,” “hike,” “like,” and “pike” when it is written. That is to say, it should be spelled “mike,” not

Continue reading “Mic” Rhymes with “Bic”

Questionable Past Tense of TREAD

Use of “well-tread” in _Writer’s Digest_ article.
The use of the adjective “well-tread” in the November/December 2016 issue of Writer’s Digest had me puzzled. The context was an article on the topic of writing about subjects that have already been frequently written about:
The title of the article is “The Road Already Taken.” This tag appears under

Continue reading Questionable Past Tense of “Tread”

Raring To Go

A reader asked me, “How does a word like rare become idiomatically used to mean eager, as in ‘raring to go’?”
Answer: It didn’t.
The rare in “raring to go” has nothing to do with the adjective that means, “seldom found.” The rare in raring is an altered pronunciation of the verb to rear: “to make to

Continue reading Raring To Go

10 Things I Didn't Know About Tarzan

Johnny Weissmuller as Tarzan of the Apes.
When I heard that a new Tarzan movie was about to be released, I started thinking about the Tarzan of my childhood: Johnny Weissmuller.
I remember Weissmuller as a great swimmer—he usually had at least one scene in which he killed some creature in the water—and as a great screamer.

Continue reading 10 Things I Didn’t Know About Tarzan

Jeopardy Does It Again

The Jeopardy errors continue to accumulate. Here’s a clue from the June 8, 2016 Double Jeopardy category “The Book Book”:
Jeopardy clue, June 8, 2016
The “day” medieval English folk thought the world would end;
it comes before “Book” in the name of a tome that counted them.
Alex accepted the response “What is the Doomsday Book?” but

Continue reading Jeopardy Does It Again

Grammar Alert: "Me" and "I"

Arkansas Democrat-Gazette cartoonist John Deering’s political cartoon in the editorial section for April 27 has me puzzled.
I’m not entirely clear as to what the cartoonist’s chief message is, but the secondary message bothers me a lot.

Common Sense or Common Knowledge?

The Washington Times published a quiz with the title “Are You Common Sense Smart?” and the invitation “Take our ‘simple’ quiz to find out.”
I came across the link on Facebook. An inveterate Facebook test-taker, I took the quiz.